Why No Fries with the iPod touch?

by Chris Howard Sep 12, 2007

After nine months of anticipation, Apple finally released an iPod based on the iPhone form factor and interface. But for reasons unknown, Apple chose to leave off one or two essential applications, and according to the latest rumor, has neutered others.

You get the feeling that if Apple bought McDonald’s they would cut the fries from the combo meals. I hope you didn’t want fries with your new iPod touch!

The iPod touch is a lovely device, and I have to out myself as being wrong. I was among those who said Apple wouldn’t release a device like it within 12 months of the iPhone.

Hindsight is a great thing, and now I can see why Apple might have done so. Certainly there’s a big market for it, but the two devices could cannibalize each other. Which, at the end of the day, matters not to Apple, as they still get a sale. And Steve said as much in a recent interview with USA Today.

However, in markets still waiting for the iPhone—such as Europe and Asia—it will be interesting to see how the iPod touch sells. Personally, I’m having a dilemma over whether to get an iPod touch or wait for the iPhone. And a young woman I spoke to at an electronics retailer said she’d be waiting.

Actually, the more more I find out about the touch, the more I lose interest in it.

I saw one reader comment on a web forum last week that the iPod touch is a PDA. I suspect, though, he’s in for a big disappointment. Apple isn’t pushing it that way, so it’s hard to know if it really is. In fact, Apple’s demo video didn’t even mention iCal or Address Book, two key apps on a PDA. And rumors have it there’ll be no ability to input calendar entries—which is upsetting a lot of people who pre-ordered specifically expecting that feature.

But the big thing missing—the fries if you will—is email. Its absence is the deciding factor in my not buying an iPod touch.

For a device that has internet access, the lack of an email client leaves one speechless. So what if you can do it online through Safari? An offline reader is essential in a portable, internet-connected device. Plus, using a browser, you have to manually check your email. Also, if you have multiple email accounts, using a browser really starts getting cumbersome.

In my part of the world, wireless hotspots are rare, so I wouldn’t be able to use the browser or email much anyway. But if hotspots were available, then I’d be eternally frustrated at having an internet device without email.

Say that again a couple of times: “an internet device without email.” Have you ever heard of anything stupider? A car without seats? A combo meal without fries? A computer without a mouse? A house without a bathroom? An internet device without email?

Possibly, someone will port the iPhone’s email client to the iPod touch, and hopefully that will force Apple to include it.

Unfortunately, this adds to the dilemma. Do I wait for the touch to get an email client? Or just get an iPod classic? And do I then forget about the iPhone?

But if the rumor of the inability to input to the calendar and address book proves true, the decision is easy. No touch. Without those PDA abilities, the difference between a touch and an iPod classic narrows too much to justify the touch.

The interesting thing is, the lack of PDA type functions, such as calendar entry and email, stops me buying an iPod touch in preference to an iPod classic. But the absence of those from the touch wouldn’t influence my decision to buy an iPhone.

I’d buy an iPhone because it’s a phone with iPod features. But I would have bought a touch if it was an iPod with email and PDA features.

With the touch having no compelling features, and already owning an iPod, albeit sans video, I expect I’ll just buy nothing.

Steve was happy to appease the angry mob over the price cut; hopefully he’ll appease the rowdy rabble over the lack of email and calendar entry.

Come on, Steve, mate, give us the fries with that iPod touch.

Comments

  • an argument[...]where one assumes a claim for the sake of argument, derives an absurd or ridiculous outcome, and then concludes that the original assumption must have been wrong as it led to an absurd result…

    Sounds like <u>everything</u> MSFT and her parasite followers are concluding these days.

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 846
  • I’d like to ask which iPods if any people are thinking of getting in the nearish future? -Ben

    I’m practically walking out to the Ó Boutique uptown to get either 16GB Touch or 160GB Classic just for the heck of it. I do hope the net widgets will solve themselves any day now that the whole Mac universe is complaining to the Great Zen. wink

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 846
  • It is unbelievably ludicrous.

    I agree with your dissection of Ludicrous One’s assertions of our desires and needs at a practical cost to both us and Ó engineering prowess.

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 846
  • I too want a terabyte of storage that i can balance on my thumbnail. I however also have some practical sense and the decency to acknowledge the engineering facts of the matter, and am prepared to wait for good solutions that are currently unfeasible.

    Well said, Ben. So how ‘bout we go to the Ó Boutique and in there, we impulsively yet use our practical senses and come out with mini box before we change our minds, eh? That goes to you too, Chris.

    Ludicrous One, stay where you are for what you want: Touch Zen edition is years from practicality.

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 846
  • I do hope the net widgets will solve themselves any day now that the whole Mac universe is complaining to the Great Zen.

    Sorry, Robo, not a chance of the Great Zen rectifying that.

    Giving back $100 is very different to saying “Hey, look, we’re going to change a device’s specs the week after it comes out because of consumer pressure.”

    If that happened it would open the flood gates of complaints every time apple released a product.

    The net widgets will come eventually from Apple, probably MWSF 2008, when the Great Zen will make a big deal over it and how Apple responds to customer requests.

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • I want my fingernails replaced with a terrabyte of storage each.

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • If that happened it would open the flood gates of complaints every time apple released a product. -Chris

    Like giving back $100 to the 750,000+ whiny first adopters did not already do that?

    The Touch non-features we have listed here and there are already an indication of such revolts against the Zen way.

    And a proof that you’re wrong Chris, here’s one from J.o.T. Enjoy…
    1008.gif width=400 height=320

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 846
  • Like giving back $100 to the 750,000+ whiny first adopters did not already do that?

    There’s a major difference between rebating coz of a price cut, and adding a feature to a new product a few weeks after its release, in either case because of user backlash.

    Money’s easy to give away, stopping the production line to add a new feature is a whole nuther story - even if it can be done by a software update.

    We’ve been complaining about new release Apple products with feature shortages since the second coming of SJ, at least, and I don’t think Apple has ever rushed to add a requested feature.


    PS LMAO smile

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • Thanks for that Apple discussions link, Robo. It’s amazing how many folks are cancelling their iPod touch orders because of the lack of calendar entry.

    I’ve also posted my thoughts to Apple via the supplied feed back link. Suggest anyone who’s not happy does too.

    iPod feedback

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • As I said in the comments under Hadley’s article, I reckon touch users will look pretty stupid adding contact details to the touch, but then having to find a pen and paper to jot down meeting info.

    For some reason, Stevie seems afraid of Apple doing a PDA again. Maybe he doesn’t want to admit that the Newton guys were right, and he was wrong to cancel it.

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • Getting back to email, I often want offline access to my email.

    And, for those who don’t have much public WiFi access, the web features are worth almost *zero*.

    Whereas email at least is still very usable and useful when you’re offline.

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 15, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • Spent the afternoon at the upscale Ó Boutique and found the iTouch to feel a bit cheap against the iPhone. The iPhone net widgets are flawless. Phone + iPod integration is seamless. The iPhone glass front felt solid due to the rounded metal edge.

    Over to the Touch, the body felt flat and cheap but lighter than an iPhone. The Touch panel doesn’t feel like the iPhone’s glass and not as bright and vivid. Perhaps, the brightness were messed with but still…

    Then the Classic’s form felt like the Touch’s or a bigger Nano. For 160GB it is impressively thin. The screen, I now admit, isn’t that bad for TV shows and properly encoded and aspect’d movie rips. The menu system now includes Coverflow - slow and jerky as rumoured but functional. Nice.

    Hmmm…I wounder if the Ludicrous One’s Zen Edition may be practical, after all.

    So, iPhone 3G here I wait…meanwhile I have to grab a Classic this Holidays.

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 16, 2007 Posts: 846
  • The Touch panel doesn’t feel like the iPhone’s glass and not as bright and vivid. -Robo

    There is another active thread in Apple’s Discussions forum regarding the Touch’s screen vividness compared to the iPhone.

    One commenter said, “My iPod Touch seems to display all black scenes and movies and pictures with an almost negative black effect, so it looks like I am staring at the LCD from a bad angle, when in fact I am staring at it dead on.”

    I noticed this first hand and was immediately a turn-off. Now, I am considering the Classic then wait for the iPhone 3G with more storage.

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 16, 2007 Posts: 846
  • More to support my claim re: Touch’s screen quality is not equal to the iPhone’s brilliant screen.

    From iProng’s Bill Palmer:

    Screen quality

    Speaking of hardware, one of the iPhone’s best features - its brilliant screen - is (sort of) missing from the iPod touch as well. Although I’ll need to do more testing to quantify it, immediately clear is the fact that the iPod Touch’s screen is neither as vivid or (seemingly) as detailed as that of the iPhone. I’ll have a lot more to say about this in the final review, but unless my eyes are thoroughly deceiving me, there’s a world of difference between the two.

    I wonder if Apple really used the exact Epson LCD layer as in the iPhone? This confirms my suspicions that the Touch LCD quality I saw today is what it is - Not Worth It! Go iPhone or Classic.

    Robomac had this to say on Sep 16, 2007 Posts: 846
  • Robo, is the iPod touch becoming a disaster for Apple? And throw in the complaints about the classic.

    Has Apple stretched the friendship with its customers too much?

    Chris Howard had this to say on Sep 16, 2007 Posts: 1209
  • Page 7 of 9 pages « First  <  5 6 7 8 9 >
You need log in, or register, in order to comment